[FoRK] A Thrive/Survive Theory Of The Political Spectrum

Reese howell.r at inkworkswell.com
Sun Feb 22 13:19:04 PST 2015


At 03:29 PM 2/22/2015, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:

>There is a contingent of pro-choice people who (correctly) see a 
>significant moral and game-theoretic hazard to abortion itself. 
>Nonetheless, the legal hazards of ascribing full personhood to a 
>fetus are deemed to create even larger systemic problems than 
>allowing abortion. Generally, people that put this level of 
>intellectual rigor into their opinion come down as pro-choice, not 
>because they support abortion per se but because it minimizes the 
>aggregate adverse consequences for a problem with no optimal 
>solution at a system level.
>
>It is not a religious argument but a pragmatic calculus to optimize 
>outcomes. I have met many rationalist atheists that seem to end up 
>in this camp. They do not support abortion but determine that 
>prohibition likely has even worse consequences. As a matter of 
>policy then, the optimal solution is to try to minimize the 
>occurrence of situations with no good outcomes.


Sure. Note, at no point did you endorse the judgmentalism or name calling
engaged in earlier.

Reese




More information about the FoRK mailing list