[FoRK] The collapse of the .net ecosystem

Stephen D. Williams sdw at lig.net
Sat Jun 20 22:42:09 PDT 2015

On 6/20/15 3:29 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Stephen D. Williams <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
>> What Unicorn, hot startup, or really any startup that you respect, is
>> using C# (outside of Unity)?  Windows?  Visual Basic?
> ​So I've been in several enterprise software startups
> (Rubric/Broadbase/Kana, Centerrun, Collation) that started off only
> supporting Linux customers but ended up needing to support Windows
> customers as well (​for the same reason as needing to support Oracle, even
> if the product ran fine on PostgreSQL -- customer lock-in, which, Stephen,
> I know you're familiar with). And in those startups I was hired as the
> Windows expert charged with adding or maintaining Windows support for the
> product.
> In each case, the product was primarily implemented in Java, with the
> exception of some OS specific code to e.g. list processes, find which ports
> and other resources those processes used, start processes, etc. For the
> Windows side I usually used .NET and WMI, accessed via C#. I chose C#
> because it's a safer language and it's not hard for the Java developers to
> understand the code (since C# and Java are so similar). If there were
> *free* and reliable Java bindings for .NET and WMI and Win32, I would have
> used Java. (There are things like https://www.javonet.com/ but they are not
> cheap.)
> So that's one reasonable use case for C#.

Absolutely.  For enterprise, products needing integration, can't get away from it.


More information about the FoRK mailing list