[FoRK] Harley & Google's battle of the sexes
gstock at nexcerpt.com
Fri Aug 11 04:27:58 PDT 2017
I will refrain from commenting on the previous substance of this thread
until at least five women have posted.
Further, all new threads should be prohibited until Rohit convinces a
significant number of women to join FoRK. (Alternately, he could drop a
significant number of men, although this may raise deeper questions of
Any application of statistics in response to my comment should focus on
establishing the "significant" number, what professions the added women (or
dropped men) must have, what their average salary must be, and so forth.
If Rohit questions any of these priorities, Google should be made aware of
his persistent, blatant sexism.
Hmmm... There may be some problems down this path...
Gary Stock gstock at nexcerpt.com
Nexcerpt http://www.nexcerpt.com/ 269.624.1140 direct
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Gregory Alan Bolcer <greg at bolcer.org>
> Insurance company A sells motorcycle insurance. Only 14% of motorcycle
> riders are women according to the Motorcycle Industry Council which is far
> less than the 28% of women w/ computer science degrees. Does that make the
> insurance company sexist? Do they charge the same for both? Why aren't
> they doing more to encourage more women to ride motorcycles? Should the
> government step in and force them to discount their insurance to women
> motorcycle riders? (Yes, Harley is Rob from his fbook post, not Davidson).
> There are groups that are trying to prove systemic racism and
> institutional racism. I'm sure systemic sexism and institutional sexism
> are next. Basically the institutional part means that anywhere you find a
> numeric discrepancy over a large enough sample set, and here's where it
> gets iffy, that it must be the cause of institutional -isms even if none
> are observed.
> So do the statistics lie?
> greg at bolcer.org, http://bolcer.org, c: +1.714.928.5476
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK