Re: "A General Theory of Love" <- great book and theory

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Date: Thu Jan 04 2001 - 22:30:26 PST

Who is the entity which discredits things like this?

On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, John Regehr wrote:

> > It doesn't mention 'bicameral mind' anywhere (according to the index and my
> > memory). It seems somewhat orthogonal to me currently. See my next post.
> Why would it mention Jaynes' stuff? I was under the impression that it
> has been pretty thoroughly discredited. I could be wrong, though - I
> just remember talking about it with some psychologists at some point.
> A good book about the mind is Pinker's _How the Mind Works_. Lots of
> good evolutionary psychology explanations for things. For whatever
> reason, these often ring true for me.
> John

 "A civilized society is one which tolerates eccentricity to the point of doubtful sanity."
          -- Robert Frost

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 04 2001 - 22:36:10 PST