Apparently it entails considerably less money than required to constitute the
premise of a cheesy American movie (albeit one with big name actors and actrix,
and lovely production values). But 1 million *is* a nice round number.
> ``Spending time with children'' was a distant 11th in
> importance, cited by just 51 percent of respondents.
At least it was enough "family values" to win an election. Then again, I wonder
how many marks 51% converts to. How many dollars would you have to get for your
kids before Hollywood would be interested in the movie rights?