Dude, the crack you smoke rules.
>> Yes, and this type of "can't see my hand in front of my face"
>> is why Microsoft is where they're at today.
> Sorry Timmy, but let's be honest: the reason Microsoft is where they
> are today is because they understand three things: (a) the "Field of
> Dreams" technology era is over, (b) they understand that their customers
> are their partners, and will pay $$$ to buy / keep customers, and (c)
> they play the best product marketing game on the planet. Couple that
> with the more insidious and subtle (d) --- they're figuring out how to
> subvert the standards process to their own ends --- and you have a
> powerful opponent. The net result is the situation we all hate --- that
> MS can shovel pure technological horseshit down the throats of every
> technology consumer on the planet and make them believe they're being
> served caviar at below cost out of the pure benevolent genius of Bill
> Gates' soul. (If he has one.)
> The infighting in the open source community actually isn't
> shortsightedness, except in perhaps a strategic, holistic sense. I see
> it as a serious if overly-semantic battle of where to draw the lines and
> where to make concessions -wrt- the definition and philosophy of open
> source, for the greater good. Not that I agree with the current
> position; IMO, anything is better than nothing... but I'm sure that if
> you examined the positions a little more closely you would find that
> there's some substance in both camps.
So the open source community is more concerned with infighting than
a,b,c, or even d. Thanks for making my point.
"If at first you don't succeed, come back and we'll beat you again." - Degeneration X