Re: Why "progressive" tax schemes are evil

From: Jeff Bone (
Date: Tue Apr 03 2001 - 08:00:32 PDT

Kragen, man, what's next? Correcting Tom on his Whorish? What's next,
Kragen? I note that Dave has yet to take me up on my challenge of proving P =
NP. Perhaps you'd like to beat your head against that?



Tom WSMF wrote:

> I tell ya one thing kragy old bean, you sure do talk a blue streak. But
> time after time, post after post, keystroke after just
> dosent matter. The simple fact of the matter is that tomwhore spoke and
> tomwhore means what he spoke and thats my friend is the bottom line. You
> can go on and quote every rang dang dictionary entry from now until the
> cows come lactating home but will be the fortitude of my words
> that will send the prudence of your corrections flying back and forth
> across the net till they fall down to the inevitable force of the whores
> backhand.
> --]That's 'prudence'. To have 'fortitude' is to have the solid
> --]foundations to do what's best (or in your best interest, if that's
> --]your highest value, which I know isn't the case with you personally,
> --]Whore baby) even when you're afraid to do so.
> Parentheticaly diluted monkey nipple drippings. This sounds more and more
> like a sidebar thread on force versus pacifity, on proactive versus
> inactive, on yin verus yang.
> --] Prudence is your resistance to foolish action; fortitude is your
> --] resistance to wrongful inaction and your ability to withstand
> --] misfortune.
> --]
> Fortitude is just about inacation? About passivity of will?
> I think perhaps the convultions of these two words speaks more to your own
> probelms with the word fortitude than my stuningly just use of it.
> And if there is any doubt........
> --]Fortitude is the virtue extolled by street gangs, and a powerful
> --]virtue it is.
> COme on, this is too easy a set up.
> --]> Fortitude is the guard and support of the other
> --]> virtues. --Locke.
> --]
> And well I use them....observe..
> --]See? I was right, you were wrong. You proved it yourself. Accept
> --]your smackdown with fortitude and prudently refrain from defending
> --]your error further.
> YA know what i proved? I proved I can make Kragen work at proving hes got
> moral problems with the word Fortitude? Some street gang nightmare of
> brutal force and use of dictonaries as impliments of punishment must be
> frimly planted in your otherwise brillant gray matter such that the mere
> us of the word sends you in apoplectic fits of posting frenzy.
> I think deep down all of us have a sort of trigger word that can set them
> off in these fits. I know for me its the capitalized version of my fave
> fruit. No not Rip Taylor (who is the Kmart antithesis and estranged half
> brother to Quentin Crisp).
> So to sum this whole monkey mess mishigas I am reminded of a passage for
> the whoratora that goes a little something like this...
> "A jewish man took his Passover lunch to eat outside in the park. He sat
> down on a bench and began eating. A little while later a blind man came
> and sat down next to him. Feeling neighborly, the Jewish man passed a
> sheet of matzo to the blind man. The blind man handled the matzo for a few
> minutes, looked puzzled, and finally exclaimed, "Who wrote this shit?" "
> Enjoy the matzo Kragen.:)-
> /"\ [---=== WSMF ----]
> \ /
> X ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> / \ Against HTML Mail

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 29 2001 - 20:25:27 PDT