Re: Clinton

CobraBoy (
Fri, 30 Jan 1998 14:44:51 -0800

At 1:30 PM -0800 1/30/98, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:

> The media has it all wrong. Starr doesn't want Lewinsky's testimony
> to find out she blew Clinton. That's not the salient fact of the matter.
> Starr wants Lewinsky's testimony on how the workings of jobs-for-hush
> money work in the Clinton Whitehouse. He is just using the perjury charge
> to coerce her to cooperate. She after all fell into the investagory net of
> an already existing investigation. Read the judge's panel report and the AG's
> agreement to expand the jurisdiction. Monica dearest fell into the
> same network that was used to get former assistant AG WWH
> Worldly Web Hubbell his pay-for-silence. Starr wants her testimony on
> these workings in order to provide a air tight, detailed description of
> how it works that will hold up in court.

Interesting. Maybe it started out that way. Or maybe it was Clinton and her
setting up Starr. I don't know how Janet Reno could authorize a wiretap on
all this and not tell Clinton.

Then again maybe it's as stupid as it looks. I don't think Starr has an IQ
over 40 mhz.