Ahhh.. mea culpa: I thought it was just the Power Schmoozing :-)
> Also, can you explain this quote:
>
> MS Outlook isn't smart enough to recognize URLs that begin URL:http://
> so Keith's usage annoys me, whether it's correct or not. But is it
> correct? The issue can't just be URLs vs. URNs and other URIs as it
> should be obvious that any URN scheme has to avoid clobbering the URL
> namespace.
>
> - dan
You hit the nail on the head. Connolly says that UR*'s are all the same;
I agree: a name is a location with a social contract behind it. So besides
being ugly and clogging UR* parsers, it encourages a false dichotomy.
RK
PS. Using a Kleene star in conversation is prime tweak behavior